Performance by Technical Area

AstraZeneca plc

General Access to Medicine Management

Ranking: 11 Score: 3.26
Compare

Has a strong access-to-medicine strategy with board-level responsibility. AstraZeneca is one of 14 companies that performs strongly with regard to its access-to-medicine strategy, which includes access-related goals and aligns with its corporate strategies. The company aims to take a commercially sustainable approach to access. The strategy centres around expanding disease prevention, awareness, treatment and capacity building in areas with limited infrastructure. The highest level of responsibility for access sits with a board member.

Non-financial access-related incentives in place for employees. AstraZeneca has non-financial incentives in place to motivate employees to perform on access-related issues. These incentives are centred around providing a good working environment and delivering on performance.

Measures and monitors outcomes and progress; not impact. AstraZeneca measures and monitors progress and outcomes of access-to-medicine activities. It also publicly reports on commitments, targets and performance information. For example, the company reports a target of reaching 25 million patients by 2025 through a variety of Health Systems Development programmes. However, it does not report measuring the impact of its initiatives.

Some transparency about stakeholder engagement. AstraZeneca publicly discloses which stakeholder groups it engages with on access issues, but does not publicly share its process for selecting who to engage with. Neither does it report on how it incorporates local stakeholder perspectives into the development of its access strategies. However, AstraZeneca publicly shares a specific policy for ensuring responsible engagement — in order to strengthen transparency and multi-stakeholder engagement (including with patient groups and other healthcare organisations aimed at improving patients' lives) and comply with local regulations.

Market Influence & Compliance

Ranking: 13 Score: 2.36
Compare

Has measures to ensure third-party compliance with ethical marketing and anti-corruption standards. AstraZeneca has a code of conduct and policy relating to ethical marketing and anti-corruption, and provides compliance training for employees on an annual basis. The company provides evidence of having formal processes in place to ensure compliance with standards by third parties. Sales agents' rewards are not solely based on sales targets. Instead, it rewards other qualities, such as accountability and integrity in the workplace. 

Internal control framework meets some Index criteria. AstraZeneca's internal control framework to ensure compliance meets some of the criteria looked for by the Index. Namely, it has an auditing and review mechanism in place, and it reports that it regularly conducts fraud-specific risk assessments. It also has a monitoring system for compliance. However, it did not demonstrate evidence of procedures to segregate duties, so that decisions are checked by another party. 

Above average transparency regarding access-related practices. AstraZeneca publicly discloses its policy positions on access-related topics (e.g., its positions on intellectual property). It discloses political contributions in countries in scope. AstraZeneca publicly discloses its membership of relevant institutions to access, but does not disclose whether it provides financial support. The company also discloses its policies for responsible engagement through its Global Policy on Ethical Interactions. During the period of analysis, AstraZeneca did not publicly disclose its policy approach to payments made to healthcare professionals in countries in scope. Following the period of analysis, the company shared plans to disclose such payments, including countries in North Africa and Latin America.

Research & Development

Ranking: 10 Score: 2.05
Compare

Commits to R&D to meet public health needs. AstraZeneca has made a specific commitment to R&D for diseases and countries in scope, but it is not publicly available. Its R&D strategy for low- and middle-income countries is informed by an evidence-based public health rationale through its "5R framework" (to help ensure the right target, patient, tissue, safety and commercial potential). Further, it has time-bound strategies for completing R&D projects for diseases in scope and evaluates progress toward these targets. AstraZeneca has the largest pipeline in the Index with 218 projects. For diseases in scope where priorities exist, AstraZeneca is active in eight projects; six of these target priority R&D gaps.

No access provisions; process in place for setting them. AstraZeneca has a general process in place to develop access plans during R&D. It is unclear whether this applies to all or some of the company's R&D projects. Mainly, AstraZeneca develops access plans for R&D projects in Phase III of clinical development. To date, AstraZeneca does not have any project-specific access provisions in place for its late-stage R&D projects. 

Policy to ensure post-trial access; commits to registering trialed products. AstraZeneca has a policy for ensuring post-trial access to treatments for clinical trial participants and has provided a detailed example of this policy in action in countries in scope. However, this policy is not publicly available. The policy is aligned with the standards set in the Declaration of Helsinki. Once a product is approved, AstraZeneca commits to registering it in all countries where clinical trials for the product have taken place. 

Pricing, Manufacturing & Distribution

Ranking: 4 Score: 2.93
Compare

Commits publicly to equitable pricing but does not report a commitment to file to register new products in scope. AstraZeneca does not commit to filing its newest products for registration in countries in scope within one year of first market approval. However, it does publicly commit to implement inter-country equitable pricing strategies for a majority of its products for diseases in scope, including for future products. Its public commitments also apply to intra-country equitable pricing strategies.

Some new products in scope filed for registration in the majority of priority countries. AstraZeneca has filed 10% of its newest products for registration to date in more than half of the relevant priority countries (disease-specific subsets of countries with a particular need for access to relevant products). However, it does not publicly share the registration status for any of its products.

60% of products have equitable pricing strategies targeting priority countries. AstraZeneca's overall performance is average compared to peers in equitable pricing. It demonstrates evidence of having  equitable pricing strategies for 60% of its products for diseases in scope. These strategies apply to an average of 19% of priority countries. Almost all of these strategies apply inter-country pricing; these take into account an average of three socioeconomic factors.

Has both globally consistent recall guidelines for countries in scope and processes to track products. AstraZeneca has guidelines for drug recalls that apply to all countries in scope. It has processes to track the distribution of products in countries in scope to facilitate rapid and effective recalls.

Patents & Licensing

Ranking: 10 Score: 2.04
Compare

Publicly discloses some information on patent statuses. AstraZeneca publicly self-discloses information relating to the status of its patents for products in scope, this includes: name of the medicine, nature of the patent, expiry date and jurisdiction. However, it does not include patent numbers.

No use of non-assert or licensing arrangements. AstraZeneca does not engage in voluntary licensing nor has it issued non-assert declarations for products in scope. It publicly states it would consider granting non-exclusive voluntary licences in certain circumstances.

Does not report newly sharing IP assets with 3rd-party researchers beyond existing agreements. AstraZeneca reported existing agreements with product development partnerships such as the Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi). During the period of analysis, beyond existing agreements, the company reports no instances where it newly shares IP assets with third-party researchers developing products for diseases in scope.

Public commitment not to enforce patents in countries in scope. AstraZeneca commits publicly to neither file for nor enforce patents related to diseases within the scope of the Index. This commitment applies to most Least Developed Countries, low-income countries, and in a subset of lower-middle income countries and upper-middle income countries.

Capacity Building

Ranking: 10 Score: 2.16
Compare

Nine initiatives included for evaluation. AstraZeneca has nine capacity building initiatives that were included for analysis by the Index: i.e., the initiatives demonstrably address a specific local need and involve local partners. Companies could submit a maximum of 25 initiatives across all areas for assessment; AstraZeneca submitted the maximum. 

Performs strongest in strengthening health systems. AstraZeneca has initiatives which meet inclusion criteria in three areas of capacity building: manufacturing, pharmacovigilance and health system strengthening. It performs strongest in health system strengthening, with programmes focused on non-communicable disease prevention and treatment. 

Five initiatives meet all applicable good practice standards:
-Healthy Heart Africa (pharmacovigilance)
-Young Health Programme
-Healthy Lung Asia
-Phakamisa South Africa
-Healthy Heart Africa (health system strengthening)
AstraZeneca's remaining included initiatives typically aim for sustainability and long-term improvements, but most commonly fall short on monitoring progress and outcomes.

Does not provide evidence of reporting substandard or falsified medicines within the recommended time frame. AstraZeneca has a policy for reporting cases of substandard or falsified medicines to local regulatory authorities. However, it does not require reporting to occur within the time frame of seven days looked for by the Index.*

Product Donations

Ranking: 11 Score: 2.87
Compare

Responds to emergencies, humanitarian crises and tracks delivery. AstraZeneca donated medicines on the request of relief agencies. For example, during the period of analysis, it donated the antibiotic meropenem (Merrem®) in response to paediatrician requests for a sepsis programme in Cambodia. The company discloses that such ad hoc donations are aligned with international guidelines (issued by WHO, PQMD), and it works, for example, with Americares and Direct Relief International to ensure products are rapidly delivered. It also monitors the delivery of the product until received by end user.

Two donation programmes covering diseases and countries in scope. AstraZeneca's programmes are focused on non-communicable diseases, namely cancer and cardiovascular disease. Both programmes are carried out in partnership with its long-term partners Americares and the Red Cross. Its breast cancer programme supplies anastrozole (Arimidex®) in Cambodia and has been ongoing since 2008. During the period of analysis, AstraZeneca reports that this has reached almost 800 patients.

No transition plans in place. AstraZeneca does not provide evidence that it considers longer-term access to donated products, for example, once a programme ends, or through transition planning.

*Defined as a recommended time frame through consultation with stakeholders during Index methodology development.


Learn more

View our detailed overview of each company’s performance in the Index, including breakdowns of their product portfolios and R&D pipelines.